Why
I Committed Civil Disobedience for Health Care Reform
Editorial
By
Howie Hawkins
I
attempted to deliver a letter on Nov. 4 from health care activists to WellPoint,
Inc., a for-profit health insurance company. When WellPoint refused to accept
the letter, I stood in their doorway and was arrested for criminal trespass.
My
act of civil disobedience took place during a picket of WellPoint's Syracuse offices
sponsored by the Mobilization for Health Care for All, Single Payer New York,
and the local chapter of Physicians for a National Health Program.
Our
letter demanded that WellPoint stop denying benefits to sick policyholders and
use its revenues for care instead of lobbying and profits.
Insurance
companies are the real death panels in America. They are the bureaucracies that
stand between you and your doctor and decide whether they will pay for the care
your doctor recommends.
For-profit
insurance companies have a direct conflict between profits and care. Their Wall
Street investors demand that insurers boost profits by denying claims.
Reforming
these predatory insurers into public servants is as futile reforming piranhas
into vegetarians. The purpose of our demonstration was not only to expose the
evils of for-profit health insurance, but also to expose the folly of the Democratic
health care plan, which tries to reform for-profit insurance.
The
Democrats took single payer, the least-cost option, off the table, and offer the
most expensive option, an insurance industry subsidy plan. The Democrats' plan
will spend about $100 billion a year over the next decade subsidizing our inefficient,
high-cost mixed system of public and private insurance, which shuttles the costly
old, poor, and sick to public insurance and steers the profitable young, affluent,
and healthy to private insurance.
The
individual and employer mandates in the Democratic plan force you to buy insurance
or pay a fine or go to jail. The mandates deliver at least 21 million new customers,
many of them subsidized by taxpayers, and at least $70 billion new annual revenues
to private insurers.
The
public option is just a fig leaf for this corporate option. The Democrats gutted
the original 'robust' public option, an option for everyone to buy into Medicare,
enrolling 130 million. Now it's a token option limited to a few, enrolling only
6 million by 2019. The Republicans who call this plan a 'government takeover of
health care' are nuts. The Democrats who still call it a 'public option' is just
as nuts.
Prescription
drug prices will remain the highest in the world thanks to a deal the Obama White
House cut with Big Pharma to bar bulk-purchasing discounts by public insurance.
Insurance
costs will continue to explode because the plan impotently relies on competition
in monopolistic local markets to keep prices in check. Private insurers will even
use the good reforms in the plan, such as the banning limits on lifetime coverage
and exclusions for pre-existing conditions, to raise prices.
The
Kucinich amendment protecting the right of states to enact single-payer nonprofit
health care was stripped from the House bill adopted Nov. 7 at the request of
the Obama Administration and then denied a floor debate and vote by House Speaker
Pelosi.
Health
care should be a right provided as a public service, not a buy-or-die commodity.
A single public payer, as provided for in the National Health Insurance bill,
HR 676, could provide universal access to top-notch care at less cost than we
now spend on our inefficient multi-payer system. Patients could choose any doctor
and clinic, unlike the managed care of most insurance today. The savings from
single payer are well-documented by many studies over the last two decades by
the Congressional Budget Office, the Government Accountability Office, and the
Harvard Medical School.
Even
better would be a single-payer health service, as provided for in the US Health
Service bill, HR 3000. Salaried physicians and other health workers would provide
care in publicly budgeted nonprofit group practices. It would be democratic and
responsive, governed from the bottom up by community health boards elected by
local residents and health workers. A single-payer health service would cost even
less than single-payer health insurance because it eliminates the other inflationary
cost drivers: fees-for-service and profit-maximizing providers. Prospective budgets
for community health boards on a per capita basis, in place retrospective fee-for-service
reimbursements by third-party insurance, would enable the correction of other
major health system problems: the shortage of primary care doctors, the bias toward
acute curative care over preventive care, and the inequitable geographic and class-based
distribution of health resources.
Whether
or not the Democrats plan passes, the health care cost and coverage crisis will
continue. It's time to abandon illusions about the public option and for-profit
insurance reform and go straight for the only solution that works: non-profit
health care for all. As Amilcar Cabral, the West African anti-colonial leader
wisely advised: 'Tell no lies. Claim no easy victories'.